I've been enjoying reading through Garden Rant (though I often go to the garden for a respite from ranting), and I particularly like this quote from their post on Henry Mitchell [emphasis mine]:
It's important, isn't it, to think of the garden as a wonderful place to be, full of wonders, (not necessarily rarities) and enchantments at all seasons. Some mischief has been done, probably, by calling the garden an "outdoor living room," as if any living room in the world had such wonderful things in it as a garden has. And as for "plant material," that is one of the supremely vulgar phrases of this language, and I hope if anybody has been using it, he will stop immediately. It is a barbarism. Plants are not "material." The phrase is commonly used by people of careless habits, indifferent brains, and, I suspect, no morals whatever. We do not want, therefore, any "plant materials" in any "outdoor living room," but we do want bushes, herbs, flowers, water-plants, and so on, and while we all have sense enough not to expect the impossible, we have a right to expect the magical. [From "Reflections on Gardening" in The Essential Earthman.]
I hate the term "plant material" as much as I hate the term "text." It's not "plant material;" it's a plant! It's not a "text;" it's a book! "Text" and "plant material" sound like things that have no life of their own.
That is so funny! I sort of like hearing "plant material" or "text" because they sort of sound a bit intelligent to me. "Plant material" sounds quite like it would be in a text book! Ha ha.
I know what you mean though. I am not a gardener (my husband is more of that than I am), but I understand the frustration. It is like calling a baby in the womb a fetus. Very scientific and devoid of life.
Posted by: Rachel W | August 16, 2006 at 08:18 AM
It also seems to put all the emphasis on the speaker - since they're the only thing around with "life."
Posted by: M Light | August 23, 2006 at 10:43 PM